From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Better process-kill-query prompt
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:31:12 -0400
Message-ID: <E1R2bhI-0003wp-F8@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3obyrx5wy.fsf@stories.gnus.org> <83ipozyebf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<m31uvnzrmj.fsf@stories.gnus.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315715484 19518 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 04:31:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:31:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 06:31:20 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1R2bhP-0002tZ-FT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:31:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46159 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1R2bhO-0004Y6-PA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:31:18 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60928)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1R2bhL-0004Xs-TZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:31:16 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1R2bhI-0003LC-Jp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:31:15 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45260)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1R2bhI-0003L6-H0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:31:12 -0400
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1R2bhI-0003wp-F8; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:31:12 -0400
In-reply-to: <m31uvnzrmj.fsf@stories.gnus.org> (message from Lars Magne
	Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:26:28 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143877
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/143877>

> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:26:28 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > How about mentioning the name of the process as well?
> 
> In my experience, the buffer name is usually a lot more helpful

I did say "as well", didn't I?

Some processes run in buffers whose name means nothing, like what
with-temp-buffer creates.  Having the process name (in addition to the
buffer name) could give a clue.