From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bzr access problems Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:45:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E359806.6090002@gmail.com> <87r556w9ax.fsf@gmail.com> <83tya2b61m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5zeuo1e.fsf@gmail.com> <4E35CC9E.9050200@gmail.com> <83d3goc1uo.fsf@gnu.org> <4E375959.2010709@gmail.com> <83aabsbk2x.fsf@gnu.org> <4E3768C1.3030300@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312263952 1965 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2011 05:45:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 05:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 07:45:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo7nX-0007J1-C7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:45:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53547 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo7nW-0007JP-Rb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo7nU-0007Ih-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo7nR-0003Va-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:45:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo7nR-0003VP-S4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:45:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo7nR-0002cj-Fa; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:45:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <4E3768C1.3030300@gmail.com> (message from Christoph Scholtes on Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:02:25 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142676 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:02:25 -0600 > From: Christoph Scholtes > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 8/1/2011 8:53 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > What protocol does this old branch use? (Look in > > .bzr/branch/branch.conf if you don't remember.) Does the branch on > > Windows use the same protocol? > > The file contains a single line on both systems: > > parent_location = bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/ Try using nosmart+, i.e. bzr up nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk I just branched the whole trunk afresh: it worked with nosmart+bzr://, but failed with bzr://. I will talk to the Savannah admins again. Thanks for trying this.