From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposed patch: allow user to disable lockfile creation Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:00:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ei1bqi8p.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311896531 22409 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2011 23:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dave@boostpro.com, johnw@newartisans.com, stephen@xemacs.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 01:42:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmaDN-0002bP-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:42:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60448 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmaDN-0000r2-Bs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmaDK-0000qg-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmZZJ-0005BK-GZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmZZJ-0005BE-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmZZG-0000We-2B; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:00:38 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lennart Borgman on Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:54:09 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142473 Archived-At: Is not the default today to have single users machines? And in other cases have accounts setups so that clashes will not occur. Most machines today are single users, but I don't follow the second part. What do you mean by "account setups"? Normally, in a multi-user machine, people cooperate and there are some files that various people might edit. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/