From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New build process? Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:06:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110726184220.GA6390@acm.acm> <87bowg6fre.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E2F2084.7070001@gmail.com> <4E3074B3.4010408@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311847619 8513 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2011 10:06:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, theophilusx@gmail.com, dan.colascione@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 28 12:06:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNUT-0003ka-Lu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:06:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55331 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNUT-00028D-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNUQ-00027w-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNUP-00017m-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:06:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNUP-00017i-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:06:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNUJ-0003qi-5T; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:06:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <4E3074B3.4010408@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:27:31 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142444 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:27:31 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: Tim Cross , david.reitter@gmail.com, > dan.colascione@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > To help move in that direction, I installed the following patch. > It assumes GNU Make, but that's a reasonable assumption these > days for developers. Developers who insist on using non-GNU "make" > can use "./autogen.sh; ./configure; make" as before. > > If there are any problems with this, please feel free to back it out > or improve it. It works, at least for me, thanks. It also indirectly solves bug#9106, so it can be closed now. (There will be a need for a minor change in the DOS config.bat script, to avoid running GNUMakefile on DOS, but that's trivial.)