From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git source mirrors inactive Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 06:16:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4DDD0DCB.4020808@online.de> <4DDE0A0D.7080400@online.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306405010 13393 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2011 10:16:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: justin@justinlilly.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 26 12:16:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QPXcO-00031E-8b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:16:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPXcN-0004Ej-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPXcK-0004EP-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPXcI-0002Td-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPXcI-0002TZ-RO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPXcH-0002W7-Ob; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:16:33 -0400 In-reply-to: <4DDE0A0D.7080400@online.de> (message from Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= on Thu, 26 May 2011 10:06:37 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139734 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:06:37 +0200 > From: Andreas Röhler > Cc: Stefan Monnier , > Emacs developers > > Thanks, below still an example pointing at the convenience of working > from git: > > # time git log -n 2 python.el > [...] > real 0m0.122s > user 0m0.020s > sys 0m0.024s > > # time bzr log -l 2 python.el > [...] > real 0m29.459s > user 0m24.554s > sys 0m0.716s It is meaningless to pick up a random command and compare based on that command alone. Here's another meaningless comparison: eliz@fencepost:~/bzr/emacs/trunk$ time bzr annotate src/xdisp.c > /dev/null real 1m43.832s user 1m25.740s sys 0m3.110s eliz@fencepost:~/git/emacs$ time git annotate src/xdisp.c > /dev/null real 5m9.646s user 4m18.400s sys 0m3.580s I don't know how frequently you need to know the last 2 changes of python.el, but the number of times I needed to annotate xdisp.c during the last 2 years is about twice a week. I will gladly trade a 29-sec wait for 3.5 min wait. YMMV.