From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8644: font-locking of multi-author changelog entries Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:20:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83oc3agvjx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxiugukt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305130876 21825 80.91.229.12 (11 May 2011 16:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8644@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 18:21:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC9s-0002wd-Ju for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:21:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC9s-0002Ho-1I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC9o-0002HW-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC9n-00049Y-3b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC9m-00048z-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC9m-0004Md-BC; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8644.130513081716719 (code B ref 8644); Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2011 16:20:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC92-0004Lc-TG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC91-0004LP-GT for 8644@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKC8v-0003V7-Bq; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:20:09 -0400 In-reply-to: <83mxiugukt.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 10 May 2011 23:38:10 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:21:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46389 Archived-At: > That depends on how much was done by the other people. Sometimes the > one who didn't code a line did all design decisions. "Suggested by" > does not cover it IMHO. Design is still ideas. We could use "design ideas suggested by..." or anything else. If the design ideas are at the level of details of writing the code, they could be part of what copyright covers. That legal distinction is not at a sharp place. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/