From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:14:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4DB50AB9.6060100@cs.ucla.edu> <83tydmaeo3.fsf@gnu.org> <4DB65FF1.5010003@cs.ucla.edu> <83aafb8p4a.fsf@gnu.org> <4DB8ABEA.3080503@cs.ucla.edu> <4DB8DAF8.7070408@cs.ucla.edu> <4DB8FB35.5090205@cs.ucla.edu> <4DB90C71.6060804@cs.ucla.edu> <4DB91D2D.5080008@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303990627 3740 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2011 11:37:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 8545@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 13:37:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPWk-0000pA-N1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:36:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPWk-0004bl-6s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPWg-0004WB-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPWe-0006X3-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPWe-0006Wy-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPBW-0005fZ-EL; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8545 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8545-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8545.130398926321733 (code B ref 8545); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8545) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2011 11:14:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPAs-0005eU-Io for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:14:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPAq-0005eI-8Y for 8545@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:14:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFPAk-00082P-JM; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:14:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <4DB91D2D.5080008@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:54:21 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:15:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46064 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:54:21 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: lekktu@gmail.com, 8545@debbugs.gnu.org > > If all that doprnt does is compute *format_end (or format_end+1 > without dereferencing format_end+1), and if the documentation > notes that format_end must point to a character > (format_end cannot point to one-past-the-buffer-end, > which is what I expected), then that part's OK. Yes, that's how things are. format_end points to the last byte of the buffer passed to doprnt.