From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8496: some file locking code in insert-file-contents cannot be right Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:07:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4DA64291.5060207@cs.ucla.edu> <4DA6A7ED.20005@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302770252 10570 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2011 08:37:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8496@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 14 10:37:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAI3L-0006YL-J8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:37:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55597 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAI3L-0000PW-2G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:37:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAI3H-0000Me-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAI3G-0005tP-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAI3G-0005tL-L2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAHas-0000dG-3A; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8496 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8496.13027684652407 (code B ref 8496); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2011 08:07:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAHab-0000cm-KO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAHaa-0000cU-AB for 8496@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAHaU-00043y-P9; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:07:38 -0400 In-reply-to: <4DA6A7ED.20005@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:53:17 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:08:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45811 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:53:17 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: 8496@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 04/13/2011 11:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > What platforms use CLASH_DETECTION? > > According to the .h files, > pretty much all the POSIXish platforms do it > (GNU/Linux, BSD, MacOS, AIX, etc.) > and it's also done on Cygwin. That's what I thought. I guess that pretty much excludes the possibility that this went undetected because no one uses it.