From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer' Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297785506 22674 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2011 15:58:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 16:58:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNID-0007jz-Fr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:58:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpNIC-00043J-TP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40708 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpNI2-00041V-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNI1-00023G-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNI1-00023A-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNI1-0003lK-9c; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:09 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:47:50 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136051 Archived-At: > This issue arises now within the single Emacs thread, and we already > handle it. Not really, because we never rewind, we only unwind. Isn't rewinding the reverse of unwinding? If we have got unwinding right (or close enough), I'd expect that makes it easy to do the rewinding right. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org