From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Installing `struct buffer' patch Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:57:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D47DFD4.1040108@gmail.com> <87r5ba7ejz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297785493 22598 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2011 15:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 16:58:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNHx-0007W7-5b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:58:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpNHw-0003v6-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40314 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpNHZ-0003mC-Nv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNHY-0001qS-OQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNHY-0001qM-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:57:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpNHY-0003dR-2y; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:57:40 -0500 In-reply-to: <87r5ba7ejz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:42:56 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136050 Archived-At: What do you think about replacing B_ with lots of individual macros, like BUF_UNDO_LIST, BUF_NAME, etc.? This might be ugly in buffer.h, but the rest of the code would be more understandable. I agree this is better, because it follows our usual practices. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org