From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:25:06 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Pm1nm-0006iP-Sf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <83ei7makon.fsf@gnu.org> <b4mk4hex0zb.fsf@jpl.org>
	<838vxuaek9.fsf@gnu.org> <m2hbcipr14.fsf@igel.home>
	<877hdebm01.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <831v3ma532.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8739o2bjci.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<83wrle8p8q.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj1t1wuz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296987930 2921 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2011 10:25:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 06 11:25:26 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pm1o2-0000oE-Br
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:25:22 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35158 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Pm1o1-0002FW-Nh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:25:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41257 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pm1nt-0002A9-Ah
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:25:16 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Pm1no-00011c-Sq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:25:13 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52800)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pm1no-00011Y-RH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:25:08 -0500
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pm1nm-0006iP-Sf; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:25:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <87lj1t1wuz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135641 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76409
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/135641>

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
> Cc: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>,
>     ding@gnus.org,
>     emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:49:08 +0900
> 
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> 
>  > By "user" I _did_ mean developers in this case.  How do we prevent the
>  > danger of committing a modified file?
> 
> By using a real branch instead of a checkout.

Are you saying that "bzr push" will somehow catch these problems where
"bzr commit" in a bound branch doesn't?

Even if so, the wiki recommends to use a bound branch, and I assume
most (if not all) committers indeed use that.