From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs Subject: Re: syncing Emacs from sources maintained elsewhere Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:55:22 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D2BA939.5090903@cs.ucla.edu> <4D34A88F.4080400@cs.ucla.edu> <4D35D842.5030003@cs.ucla.edu> <83wrlvztda.fsf@gnu.org> <4D3C91E2.3010007@cs.ucla.edu> <83fwsjymcw.fsf@gnu.org> <4D3E0FCE.9040908@cs.ucla.edu> <838vy7y8jz.fsf@gnu.org> <4D413962.4060603@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296122159 13788 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2011 09:55:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 10:55:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiOa1-0000Gk-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:55:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiOZt-0007L8-Dw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49359 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiOZd-0007JJ-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiOZb-0008Mh-VR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiOZb-0008Md-U4; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:55:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiOZW-0005jr-U8; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:55:22 -0500 In-reply-to: <4D413962.4060603@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:22:42 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135086 gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs:25015 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:22:42 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org > > On 01/26/2011 07:43 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > . Is it true that time_r.c is needed only by mktime.c? > > Yes, for now, but once I add the strftime module, time_r.c will also be needed > by strftime.c, and in that case MinGW will definitely need to worry about > time_r.c. > > strftime is quite likely to be added. I've already coded it up and tested > it, and it works fine on POSIXy platforms. I plan to add it to Emacs > soon. Thanks for the heads-up. Does gnulib's strftime support MinGW? > Once it's in, Emacs's format-time-string function can start supporting > higher-resolution time stamps. Is this enabled for MinGW as well? > > . Is it true that stddef.in.h, unistd.in.h, and time.in.h are needed > > only on systems which have "issues" with the corresponding > > standard headers? > > The "issues" are either with the headers, or with the implementations of > functions declared by the headers. > > > is it okay to compile gnulib sources in > > lib/ without editing these 3 into the corresponding *.h files? > > If the MinGW headers and implementations are good enough, you should > be OK without the .h files. I'd be surprised if that were true, though. Where can I find some docs regarding what is considered to be "good enough"? Thanks.