From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: mm-charset-override-alist Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org> <83ipxuie35.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqrubpod.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87lj2ga8pg.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295492095 9130 80.91.229.12 (20 Jan 2011 02:54:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:54:55 +0000 (UTC) To: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 20 03:54:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfkfi-0005ul-Nh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:54:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34372 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfkfi-0001Hr-Ar for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:54:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41071 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfkfb-0001HX-VS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:54:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfkfa-0000S9-WC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:54:43 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfkfa-0000S5-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:54:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfk83-0001Qm-Fr; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:20:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.12954899745461 (code B ref 7626); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2011 02:19:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfk7Z-0001Q2-R5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:19:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfk7Y-0001Pq-0Z for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:19:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfkF4-0004W8-9i for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:27:18 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:40:08 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:20:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43471 Archived-At: > From: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:40:08 -0500 > Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org > Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii > > rmail-reply uses the encoding of the message replied to for setting > the encoding of the reply. Sorry, that was inaccurate and misleading. It's not rmail-reply, it's mail-yank-original who does that, and it only does it if the encoding of the reply buffer is the default buffer-file-coding-system (i.e. was not yet set in any non-trivial way). Here's the relevant part of mail-yank-original: ;; If they yank the original text, the encoding of the ;; original message is a better default than ;; the default buffer-file-coding-system. (and (coding-system-equal (default-value 'buffer-file-coding-system) buffer-file-coding-system) (setq buffer-file-coding-system (coding-system-change-text-conversion buffer-file-coding-system (coding-system-base (with-current-buffer original buffer-file-coding-system)))))) The logic behind this is that if your reply cites the original, it had better start with the encoding of that original.