From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: mm-charset-override-alist (was: bug#7626: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:10:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> <83oc7tkv4x.fsf@gnu.org> <83ipxuie35.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqrubpod.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295364451 16519 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2011 15:27:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reiner Steib Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 18 16:27:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfDSu-0008L0-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:27:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41441 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfDSs-0005GG-5z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:27:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40879 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfDQF-0003Xf-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:24:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfDQD-0003px-IK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfDQD-0003pq-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:24:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfD5J-0000Ya-SS; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:03:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.12953629782132 (code B ref 7626); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2011 15:02:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfD5A-0000YD-Bz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:02:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfD57-0000Y0-Hr for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PfDCZ-0002wo-7H; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:10:31 -0500 In-reply-to: <87pqrubpod.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (message from Reiner Steib on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:07:30 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:03:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43426 Archived-At: > From: Reiner Steib > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 7626@debbugs.gnu.org > Reply-To: Reiner Steib > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:07:30 +0100 > > I think `mm-charset-override-alist' should be on by default. Before I > added (back in 2005) we frequently had complains about "why doesn't > Gnus display this article correctly?". I don't recall any real > problems with this. 2005 was 6 years ago. Perhaps things changed since then.