From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7789: cannot send smtpmail using gmail & tls on woe32 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83y66zmilu.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbdneymc.fsf@gnu.org> <84k4i4x87t.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295304885 16565 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2011 22:54:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 23:54:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PexyC-0005VZ-UV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:54:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PexyC-00034u-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:54:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36876 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pexy7-00034Y-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pexy6-0000k8-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pexy5-0000jw-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:54:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pexk3-0002LJ-6L; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:40:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12953039988991 (code B ref -1); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2011 22:39:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pexjy-0002Ky-50 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:39:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pexjw-0002Kh-7L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:39:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PexrK-0007fL-R2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:60146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PexrK-0007fG-P3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60176 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PexrJ-0000SZ-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PexrI-0007eq-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:58749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PexrI-0007em-Nd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PexrE-0005Hf-Qo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:47:28 -0500 In-reply-to: <84k4i4x87t.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:40:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43419 Archived-At: > From: claudio.bley@gmail.com (Claudio Bley) > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:09:10 +0100 > > gnutls-cli waits for a SIGALRM to initiate the STARTTLS handshake -- > which Emacs isn't able to send -- or, alternatively, an EOF -- which > doesn't work because communication is done over a pipe instead of a > PTY. Is this a bug in the ported gnutls, in Emacs, or in both? > I'm using cygwin's gnutls-cli and have hacked ssl.el in order to > replace the signal-process calls with (call-process "kill.exe" nil nil > nil "-ALRM" PID). This works because cygwin provides its own layer of > signal handling and is able to send / receive the SIGALRM signal. How about making that hack part of Emacs? It could be conditioned on running on Windows. TIA