From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: 23.2.91; Rmail shows incorrect message encoding in the mode line Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:24:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83ei9miqef.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295268886 18892 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2011 12:54:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 13:54:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeobX-0003qV-Ul for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:54:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeobX-0002NU-Gg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56648 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeobS-0002M4-Hv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeobQ-0001xb-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeobQ-0001xV-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Peo18-0004w4-Kb; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.129526659718935 (code B ref 7626); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2011 12:16:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Peo0i-0004vL-Ql for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:16:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Peo0g-0004vA-5Q for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:16:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Peo84-0006Nu-O4; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:24:12 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:35:38 +0900) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:17:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43411 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:35:38 +0900 > > In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > But the mbox format uses Unix EOLs. > > On Windows too? I didn't know that. It must, because Rmail reads the mbox file or stream with no-conversion. > > In fact, Rmail will barf if you > > say "C-u g FILE RET", and FILE has DOS EOLs. So the EOL format is > > known in advance in this case. > > Are you arguing that typing 'o' (rmail-output) will write > DOS EOL file when EOL type of buffer-file-coding-system of > rmail buffer is undecided and the system_eol_type is DOS? > Then, isn't it a bug of rmail-output? That's a separate issue. I just don't like seeing a buffer whose file was read with no-conversion show ":" as the EOL mnemonic. It's not a catastrophe, I just don't see why we should change this aspect of Rmail which is how it behaved for several Emacs releases. > The reason I decided to leave EOL type undecided is for the > case of M-x write-region on rmail buffer. In that case, I > think, following system_eol_type is the right thing. But we don't behave like that with buffers that visit files, do we? Why is this use-case different?