From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug in 23.2.92 with anything Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87aaj2asy4.fsf@gmail.com> <4D31FDEC.9050508@gmx.at> <4D32D81B.5090905@gmx.at> <4D33301C.3080100@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295218863 16219 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2011 23:01:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 00:00:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pebaj-0005s3-3D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PebPM-0006MA-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58041 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PebPF-0006M5-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PebPD-0003Zo-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PebPD-0003Zj-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PebP9-0006hO-7b; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:48:59 -0500 In-reply-to: <4D33301C.3080100@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:51:24 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134617 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:51:24 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com > > > /* When running redisplay, we play a bit fast-and-loose and allow e.g. > > selected_frame and selected_window to be temporarily out-of-sync so > > when we come back here via `goto retry', we need to resync because we > > may need to run Elisp code (via prepare_menu_bars). */ > > select_frame_for_redisplay (old_frame); > > > > It would be good to get rid of such risky code. > > Is there any reason why this should not select the window too? By "this" you mean what? IOW, who or what should "select the window too"?