From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: 23.2.91; Rmail shows incorrect message encoding in the mode line Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:22:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83ei9miqef.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295025880 5613 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2011 17:24:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 14 18:24:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnO7-0005aM-M0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:24:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdnO7-00029H-4W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32900 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdnNv-00027L-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnNu-0007oV-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnNu-0007oQ-Gz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnEt-00064D-65; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:15:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.129502530023296 (code B ref 7626); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2011 17:15:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnEq-00063g-48 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnEn-00063P-Ol for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:14:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnM6-00077h-27; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:22:30 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:15:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43365 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900 > > In article <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > . If the message has an explicit specification of its charset, the > > EOL type of the RMAIL buffer is left unspecified (displayed as `:' > > in the mode line). By contrast, when there's no charset= spec, the > > EOL type is correctly set to -unix. > > I think the buffer-file-coding-system of rmail buffer should > leave the EOL type unspecified in any cases. Why would this be useful? In any case, this is a change in behavior from previous Rmail versions.