From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Indexed search with grep-like output
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:02:40 -0500
Message-ID: <E1PZk3c-0000oQ-NN@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <AANLkTi=oXyCaF7E2PCeR94X1Kx7NOXM1cq5Gbp3=ecPL@mail.gmail.com>
	<831v4wpcue.fsf@gnu.org>
	<AANLkTin=EAfi6sQX5wMAocxRX6WoOaEWYNaPQHocQbtY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim04dFfOzZKRoQV7Z0vbv9NcT2S=s_JWJgb4urd@mail.gmail.com>
	<83wrmone2h.fsf@gnu.org>
	<AANLkTinWN-O_akBcm98b=riHHrU22y4bXXoCtS-dtws1@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1PZLxS-00018K-E3@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<AANLkTi=fBO6-o04RhOMitn8vobToVBegCoEzXAMshXpf@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1PZO1p-0004g7-4S@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<AANLkTik6qkn7V5WXavWiN_J+zy9RS3Tw3Woq9E+ZQ-KO@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1PZONT-0005jF-Qe@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<AANLkTimOVJRHSySwW8s0Y6R-bUg7km2M_hvO=Q8wrx6v@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1PZQD0-0003b7-8X@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<AANLkTi=7XFUK+Ox3g6vyA774cd+NoN9mXyMAncOKuFBq@mail.gmail.com>
	<jwvoc7yfx5k.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<AANLkTimtQURm4iQcM+6FObzdvFNqRftC07=kFV7FPWuT@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294059777 3782 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2011 13:02:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 03 14:02:52 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1PZk3o-0007bP-Iu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:02:52 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52939 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1PZk3n-0007Ae-Mz
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:02:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43620 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZk3h-00079S-BA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:02:46 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1PZk3g-0006sx-AG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:02:45 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:53826)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1PZk3g-0006st-7a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:02:44 -0500
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1PZk3c-0000oQ-NN; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:02:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimtQURm4iQcM+6FObzdvFNqRftC07=kFV7FPWuT@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from Lennart Borgman on Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:14:19 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134208
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/134208>

> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:14:19 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > Clearly, the wrong thing you did is focus on non-Free tools.
> 
> ;-)
> 
> That is not my fault. Those are the only tools I could find that are
> easy to setup on w32.

I just mentioned 2 Free tools in this thread alone.  And there are
others.  So I don't see how you can say it's not your fault.