From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ns-win.el Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <19651.37838.815906.240014@fencepost.gnu.org> <7seibdzmke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <6B12217D-6FF2-42FE-A53C-AAA32C7AC510@gmail.com> <87hbg914qn.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288104148 6104 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2010 14:42:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 16:42:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAkjB-0006tV-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:42:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44926 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAkj9-00058m-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46656 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAkiz-00057e-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAkiv-0007mh-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAkiv-0007mc-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAkiu-0004Z2-Ac; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <87hbg914qn.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:08:16 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132130 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:08:16 -0500 > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:49:10 -0400 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Glenn Morris > >> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:50:30 -0400 > >> Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> > >> BTW I kind of thought the point of Emacs was to look the same on all > >> platforms > > EZ> Indeed. For comparison, several requests to make Emacs on Windows > EZ> behave more Windows-like were rejected for this very reason. > > What if the "native" look is optional and off by default? That'd be fine, IMO. We do that elsewhere. For example, ls-lisp.el has a few options whose non-default values make Dired behave like Windows file managers do.