From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding GnuTLS to the Windows port Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:06:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286460693 8240 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2010 14:11:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 16:11:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rBe-0002Xn-RB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:11:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53997 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3rBd-00048I-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57057 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3r7g-0001to-1h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3r7Z-0001VU-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3r7Z-0001VQ-UI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:06:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3r7Z-0003LP-KQ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:06:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:09:43 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131428 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:09:43 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > The only > > point I care about, really, is that such a change be made keeping in > > mind the likely future addition of a more general support for > > dynamic loading. > > I cannot comment on that, as I know nothing about the future "general > support for dynamic loading", other than the legal issues that were > commented here a while ago. I don't see how the machinery in question can get in the way of the more general support for dynamic loading. Having an alist of libraries indexed by the features which need them is something we will need to keep if we want true dynamic loading.