From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:42:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4CA52B36.6060405@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285933353 4410 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2010 11:42:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 13:42:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1e0V-0007pS-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:42:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1e0V-0001bv-BU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55882 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1e0L-0001a9-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:42:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1e0J-0004Z5-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:43541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1e0J-0004Yw-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1e0J-00020s-BS; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:42:19 -0400 In-reply-to: <4CA52B36.6060405@gmail.com> (message from Daniel Colascione on Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:28:38 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131149 Archived-At: > Those are all rather heavy things by nature, so if the calling > sequence is heavy too, that's ok. > If I added a `remove-if' function I would like it not to be so heavy > to use. You can use compiler-macros (or an equivalent) to create "fast" calls when the keywords involved are known beforehand, as they almost always are. Indeed, one could do that. However, that doesn't mean that it is unimportant to choose a good, convenient interface as the one we offer and document.