From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:56:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7setll.fsf@altern.org> <871v8obqya.fsf@altern.org> <87tylkzkia.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d3s8zj2y.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284987413 23552 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2010 12:56:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 14:56:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxfvM-0003ei-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:56:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxfvJ-0007KS-AX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47722 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oxfuv-00071a-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxful-0002Ea-Hu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxful-0002EN-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxful-0003UF-43; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:56:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d3s8zj2y.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:37:57 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130533 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:37:57 +0200 > > Deniz Dogan writes: > > > 2010/9/20 David Kastrup : > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > >>>> From: Bastien > >>>> Cc: lennart.borgman@gmail.com,  rms@gnu.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  drew.adams@oracle.com,  miles@gnu.org > >>>> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200 > >>>> > >>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>>> > >>>> >> But besides that, is there any reason why no poll has been made so far? > >>>> > > >>>> > Because we know better without any polls? > >>>> > >>>> The problem is we all might have a different interpretation of "we". > >>> > >>> I meant _my_ interpretation. > >> > >> Shouldn't that read "We meant _our_ interpretation" for consistency? > > > > I think Eli means "his" interpretation of "we". > > For our interpretation of "his"? > > > I wonder how we should interpret that... > > I wonder why we should interpret that. Yes.