From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:34:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7setll.fsf@altern.org> <871v8obqya.fsf@altern.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284982466 517 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2010 11:34:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 13:34:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxedb-0004tV-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:34:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44745 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oxeda-0004yb-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:34:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47305 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxedT-0004yU-Vq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxedP-00011Q-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxedP-00011M-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxedF-0000XK-BZ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:34:01 -0400 In-reply-to: <871v8obqya.fsf@altern.org> (message from Bastien on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130527 Archived-At: > From: Bastien > Cc: lennart.borgman@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> But besides that, is there any reason why no poll has been made so far? > > > > Because we know better without any polls? > > The problem is we all might have a different interpretation of "we". I meant _my_ interpretation.