From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:58:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1284716487.5481.61.camel@piko.site> <83pqwc1t9p.fsf@gnu.org> <1284731388.5452.8.camel@piko.site> <83eics1guw.fsf@gnu.org> <1284783571.3343.8.camel@piko.site> <83mxrfz9se.fsf@gnu.org> <1284873853.3330.55.camel@piko.site> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284876664 28614 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 06:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 06:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, 7053@debbugs.gnu.org, dominik@science.uva.nl To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alp=C3=A1r_?= =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCttner?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 08:11:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxD74-000613-J7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:10:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxD73-000489-Sg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50524 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxD6v-00047r-BP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxD6t-0005RA-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxD6t-0005R5-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCta-00074u-3Z; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7053.128487579327199 (code B ref 7053); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2010 05:56:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCt6-00074e-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCt5-00074Z-BP for 7053@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:56:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCvN-0001nb-Jl; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:58:53 -0400 In-reply-to: <1284873853.3330.55.camel@piko.site> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Alp=C3=A1r_?= =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCttner?= on Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:24:13 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:57:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40303 Archived-At: > From: Alpár Jüttner > Cc: 7053@debbugs.gnu.org, Carsten Dominik , > auctex-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:24:13 +0200 > > > Failing that, perhaps you could do a "bzr bisect" to find the revision > > which broke reftex. > > I try to avoid to do it as far as I can. I'm a big fan of distributed > version control systems. I use hg in several project with grate success > and satisfaction. I people have also very good experience with git. > > But bzr is so much pain to use. A 'bzr pull' triggers tens of MB net > traffic every time (and takes long minutes), operations that are > instantaneous on hg/git takes ages here (log, update, status, diff). If you have a bzr repository on your machine, then "bzr bisect" is a local operation that doesn't involve any network traffic or negotiation with the remote repository. So there's no reason not to use "bzr bisect".