From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:33:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkwhtws5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9t8klf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83lj81pazq.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaogpcbu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd737pxd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83pqxboi38.fsf@gnu.org> <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19570.10774.921000.853692@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283290453 8955 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2010 21:34:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 31 23:34:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqYSz-0006RE-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:34:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48407 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqYSy-0002MX-Ck for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51824 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqYSo-0002Kx-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OqYSn-0007Q0-P5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:32832) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OqYSn-0007Pw-IX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqYSl-0007GC-TD; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:33:51 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:32:12 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129514 Archived-At: I think what Udday is trying to say (he'll correct me if I'm wrong) is that it is a bit unfortunate that you can impel a GNU project to use Bazaar, but you are unable to motivate Bazaar developers, or indeed Savannah sysadmins, to better cater to GNU projects' needs. I agree it is unfortunate, and I keep trying. It looks like some progress is being made. If I get a clear explanation of the need for rebase in Emacs development, that ought to enable me to push the Bazaar developers more effectively.