From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6908: 24.0.50; RMAIL sending fails in some case Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:21:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6008-Wed25Aug2010132508+0100-jpff@codemist.co.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282743589 5504 80.91.229.12 (25 Aug 2010 13:39:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6908@debbugs.gnu.org To: john ffitch Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 15:39:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoGCb-0002KA-Al for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:39:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoGCU-0002JI-DV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39351 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoGCI-0002Hz-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:39:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoGCH-0000zs-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoGCH-0000zi-6B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:39:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoFuX-0007vO-LL; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6908 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6908-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6908.128274243630455 (code B ref 6908); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6908) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2010 13:20:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoFu8-0007vA-4S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:20:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoFu6-0007v5-Rc for 6908@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoFvQ-0004oB-JE; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:21:56 -0400 In-reply-to: <6008-Wed25Aug2010132508+0100-jpff@codemist.co.uk> (message from john ffitch on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:25:08 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:21:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39741 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:25:08 +0100 > From: john ffitch > Cc: > > If I use r to reply to this References get appended to the To field > and mangled. If I copy the References to after the Subject it works. I cannot reproduce this with Emacs built 3 days ago (which is 2 days after you built yours). Does this happen to you in "emacs -Q"? If you can reproduce this in "emacs -Q", please show a message that consistently causes you this problem. The one you posted with the original report already has Message-ID: _after_ the Subject, and does not have any References header. So I'm unsure whether the message you posted does indeed cause this problem.