From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr send workflow Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87occvzosg.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> <87lj7z6pyn.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87eidqyam4.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> <87bp8u6k4e.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282541611 24731 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2010 05:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bojan@bnikolic.co.uk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 23 07:33:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnPey-0000Ys-FL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:33:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnPev-0006xU-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44537 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnPen-0006wx-SW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnPem-0001dZ-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56776) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnPem-0001dU-NB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnPel-0004si-Hy; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <87bp8u6k4e.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129063 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:14:25 +0900 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I don't think that having Stefan merge Eli's changes is efficient > use of anybody's time. (and vice versa) I agree completely. > AFAIK Stefan et al are already as willing to accept merge directives > as any other form of patch. It wouldn't hurt to advertise that > option, of course. But I really don't think it's a solution to the > current bottleneck. 100% agreement. Unless we have a clerk whose job is committing bundles sent by others, and unless that clerk is on a very fast link, this suggestion will not resolve the root cause of the problems being discussed here.