From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:24:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkwhtws5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9t8klf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83lj81pazq.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaogpcbu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd737pxd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83pqxboi38.fsf@gnu.org> <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282537500 14779 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2010 04:25:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 23 06:24:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnOag-00035h-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:24:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59960 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnOaf-00026z-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34122 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnOaa-00026I-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnOaZ-0001Jz-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56664) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnOaZ-0001Ju-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:24:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnOaX-00019p-Tj; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:24:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from Uday S Reddy on Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:17 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129055 Archived-At: If Bazaar is a "gnu project", can FSF lean on them to produce a proper integrated rebase? I can try -- but first I need a clear and self-contained description of the problem. Is the problem solely one of occasional unpredictable failures?