From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:44:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkwhtws5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9t8klf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83lj81pazq.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaogpcbu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd737pxd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83pqxboi38.fsf@gnu.org> <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282470261 14150 80.91.229.12 (22 Aug 2010 09:44:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 11:44:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On76A-0000gl-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:44:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On769-0008MV-Uf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52427 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On762-0008MQ-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1On761-00055W-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44113) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1On760-00055S-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On75z-0000IS-Fu; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:44:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from Uday S Reddy on Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:17 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129022 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:17 +0100 > From: Uday S Reddy > Cc: Uday S Reddy , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > If Bazaar is a "gnu project", can FSF lean on them to produce a > proper integrated rebase? They could try. However, several of the Bazaar developers think that rebase is a "bad thing", you can find it in the archives. So...