From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:49:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ocitw2dl.fsf@stupidchicken.com><201003130001.o2D01FFQ003489@godzilla.ics.uci.edu><87vdd1yqe4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87eijjzrkd.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org><20100317143519.GB4381@muc.de> <361BF0A38D1B4C54942BEE7AF07981E6@us.oracle.com> <7CC1DE9AB1DE4C06AD900FB3188AB257@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269103844 29389 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2010 16:50:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, acm@muc.de To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 17:50:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt1sj-0005Ga-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:50:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nt1si-0007Ml-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nt1rq-00071R-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:49:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47790 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nt1rq-00071J-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:49:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt1rp-0003pk-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:34238) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt1ro-0003pg-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nt1rn-00028W-1V; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:49:39 -0400 In-reply-to: (drew.adams@oracle.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122367 Archived-At: If you want to add "based on real experience" after "If the consensus is strong enough", I certainly support that. To reject a proposed incompatible change does not require a consensus against it.