From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267164104 2751 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2010 06:01:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 07:01:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NktGc-00070h-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:01:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46068 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NktGc-0001wu-1P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NktGU-0001vr-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58688 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NktGT-0001vb-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NktGS-0003uJ-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36165) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NktGS-0003uF-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:28 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NktGR-0001iB-Jp; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:27 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Leo on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:10:11 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121384 Archived-At: > The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30 > MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're > talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository > (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when > checking out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.) And if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again. Would someone please discuss this with the BZR developers? That's the way to make useful progress happen.