From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bob@gnu.org (Robert J. Chassell) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:17:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87mxywzx2r.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: bob@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267150695 6789 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2010 02:18:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 03:18:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkpmK-00026r-37 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:18:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkpmI-0000eg-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkpmD-0000dq-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:18:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44018 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkpmC-0000c7-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:18:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkpmA-0002v5-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:18:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57584) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkpm9-0002v1-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from bob by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkpm9-00042z-Em; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:17:57 -0500 In-reply-to: <87mxywzx2r.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:59:08 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121380 Archived-At: > Definitely, those files were added with `bzr add'. You did it > inadvertently. > > I did not. Yes, you did. Bazaar does not add files without being told so. I really don't think I did more than a `commit' but I cannot remember so I am not sure. As far as I know, the documentation does not recommend a `diff' before a `commit' or an `add'. It should so that a person notices, even one who makes mistakes like I do. Why did the files of W3M mode in my Emacs get added? > How do I commit one file? That's explained on http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs Actually, it does not that I found, but it is very useful to know that bzr commit one-file another-file ... does exist. Thank you. It turns out that http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BzrForEmacsDevs has information on `uncommit', which I had not realized before. (In other words, I noticed the command but paid no attention to it.) The documentation says `there s no compelling reason to do it if you're just revising a change' so the presumption I would make (and probably did) is that there was some easier way to remove an error: That was before I understood the implication that you add always, which is what I now think (unless you want to do something difficult or have possible bugs). -- Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.org bob@rattlesnake.com http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc