From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bob@gnu.org (Robert J. Chassell) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: bob@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267138371 5716 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 22:52:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 23:52:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkmZN-0004HJ-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:52:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkmZM-0003pE-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkmYi-0003Rf-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57298 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkmYg-0003RG-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkmYf-0002ap-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:60870) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkmYe-0002ae-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:48 -0500 Original-Received: from bob by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkmYd-0006pk-Rn; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:47 -0500 In-reply-to: <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:52:45 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121375 Archived-At: Definitely, those files were added with `bzr add'. You did it inadvertently. I did not. I did a commit and the command must have moved W3M mode files in my running Emacs to the master, which I did not intend. Why is that? How do I commit one file? Last time I looked, it wasn't a good idea to mix the instructions of those documents. Stick to one or another, but not both. Where in BzrForEmacsDevs and BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs does it say that you should not commit? The command is in both. (I am serious; remember, those who wrote BzrForEmacsDevs and BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs tried to explain Bazaar and I thought they did a good job.) > What are the `unthinkable' ways of removing unwanted files? I'm not sure I understand your question. With bzr, you do `bzr uncommit --revision N'. DON'T EVER DO THAT ON A PUBLIC BRANCH ... just in case that setting's implementation has bugs, don't try it. OK, I won't. Are you saying that no one has a low-probability-of-error method in bzr that removes mistakes? As Leo said, ... if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again which is true. -- Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.org bob@rattlesnake.com http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc