From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bob@gnu.org Robert J. Chassell) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: \ <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> \ <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: bob@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267126436 25645 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 19:33:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 20:33:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkjT3-0006KI-1k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:33:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34139 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkjT2-0001MN-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:33:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkjQu-0000ug-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50137 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkjQt-0000uK-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkjQs-0001kV-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36609) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NkjQr-0001kO-QN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:33 -0500 Original-Received: from bob by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkjQr-0002wH-ED; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:26 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121370 Archived-At: No, I did not `bzr add'; I followed the instructions in BzrForEmacsDevs and BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs. I did start W3m mode in my Emacs, but why those files got committed to the master, I don't know. David Reitter is right, The consequences get worse in proportion to the time span between the = faulty commit and the history manipulation. What are the `unthinkable' ways of removing unwanted files? What do you do when you make a mistake? -- Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.org bob@rattlesnake.com http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc