From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Commit netiquette.
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:25:40 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Nk0O4-0000KI-Ky@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87eikjzaug.fsf@telefonica.net>
	<E1Ni7dY-0005p4-Ew@fencepost.gnu.org> 
	<f7ccd24b1002180712s704c99faq88e8a7ce7c8e16b3@mail.gmail.com> 
	<E1NiO3Z-0005JY-LO@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<f7ccd24b1002190039h1f19b834hfd048417d7c0770d@mail.gmail.com> 
	<E1NioaH-0006bd-UJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<f7ccd24b1002201055j45e5d1e6rf575debeeee582a5@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: ams@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266955261 19916 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2010 20:01:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:01:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 23 21:00:54 2010
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Nk0w5-0005c1-Gp
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:00:49 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41035 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nk0w4-0007Ur-UG
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:48 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nk0w0-0007UX-4r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:44 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52426 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nk0vz-0007UM-OX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:43 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1Nk0vp-0001Pt-8z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:43 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56282)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1Nk0vo-0001PJ-Ly
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:33 -0500
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
	id 1Nk0O4-0000KI-Ky; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:25:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <f7ccd24b1002201055j45e5d1e6rf575debeeee582a5@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from Juanma Barranquero on Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:55:18 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121309
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/121309>

   > The two contain the same information, so essentially they are the
   > same.

   I disagree, and Miles has answered that in detail.

   But I find interesting that you didn't answer the main question in
   my message.

If you feel I missed your main point, then you should repeat it, since
I cannot answer what I do not know.