From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay system of emacs Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4B633B7C.8030700@gmx.de> <873a1nvlki.fsf@gmail.com> <4B65B180.5010202@gmx.de> <87ock8pb21.fsf@xemacs.org> <874olzowzq.fsf@xemacs.org> <87pr4m2ptm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87iqadmdsk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265396920 11282 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2010 19:08:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 20:08:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NdTXh-0000oC-Be for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:08:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NdTXg-0002fY-Na for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NdTXc-0002fG-EF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60571 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NdTXc-0002f8-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NdTXZ-0000bx-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52305) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NdTXW-0000bJ-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:27 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NdTXV-0004bG-N4; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <87iqadmdsk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:38:19 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120951 Archived-At: I don't see that. The main point of freedom is that it benefits everyone, including those who don't fight for it. Freedom is a benefit for everyone who has freedom, including those who don't fight for it. But we have a fight on our hands, and if we want to win it, we need to encourange more people to fight for freedom. We need to present a clear example of judging the right and wrong of the things people do in the software field. Do we really want to spread the idea that it is immoral to prefer using free software unless you share our morals, We never say that.