From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `bzr viz' slooow Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20100127.070205.124081201.wl@gnu.org> <87pr4vvm4g.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100127.123024.170021878.wl@gnu.org> <20100127.125133.183018597.wl@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264593968 29631 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2010 12:06:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Werner LEMBERG Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 13:06:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Na6en-0006B3-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:06:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Na6el-00063L-K9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Na6ef-00062C-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Na6eb-00060T-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39794 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Na6ea-00060Q-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51144) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Na6ea-00045K-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Na6ea-0002LN-29; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:05:48 -0500 In-reply-to: <20100127.125133.183018597.wl@gnu.org> (message from Werner LEMBERG on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:51:33 +0100 (CET)) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120496 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:51:33 +0100 (CET) > From: Werner LEMBERG > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > I'll try qlog. > > Well, it is indeed much faster in displaying the log tree. However, > it has different weaknesses: Clicking on a commit from a branch (I > mean the pink stuff like rev. 99322.1.8, however it is named) to see > the diff, I have to wait almost 30 seconds until it gets displayed. > Additionally, there doesn't seem to be a possibility to configure the > behaviour of the `diff' window (for example, I would like to always > start it in unidiff mode). Maybe Someone(TM) should simply add a version DAG display to Emacs's VC. (Maybe it even already exists, I don't know.) Don't we have enough infrastructure in tree-widget to make that possible? Nothing will ever be as customizable as Emacs.