From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merge conlict? Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83vdeq634g.fsf@gnu.org> <83sk9u5wes.fsf@gnu.org> <87ljfm329g.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ljfleita.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83d40w69hv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264546200 4155 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2010 22:50:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 23:49:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NZuEB-00049P-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:49:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZuEC-0007J6-R6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:49:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZu8Y-0000wG-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:43:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZu8T-0000pV-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59169 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZu8S-0000p1-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:43:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:32892) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZu8S-0005IY-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:43:48 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZu8S-00056o-6C; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:43:48 -0500 In-reply-to: <83d40w69hv.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:50:36 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120469 Archived-At: > Should only the maintainers, Stefan and Yidong, be able to do > trunk->branch merges? No! Every developer who works on a feature in a separate branch needs to do that from time to time, to avoid diverging too much from mainline. Sorry, it is the push from a branch that caused the confusion. Should only the maintainers, Stefan and Yidong, be able to do that?