From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#936: fixing/disabling the bug news->mail gateway Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:36:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <873a29lnnz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87eils901p.fsf@wanchan.jasonrumney.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263592922 8180 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2010 22:02:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, 936@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 15 23:01:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVuEs-0001qV-2K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:01:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVuEs-0000HV-UA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVuEm-0000Dv-9W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVuEh-0008Sx-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:01:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49372 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVuEh-0008Sc-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:01:43 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46383) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVuEg-0007Jb-Nd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:01:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVtrm-0000XO-Hs; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 936 X-Emacs-PR-Package: debbugs.gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 936-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B936.12635914262026 (code B ref 936); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2010 21:37:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVtqr-0000Wc-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVtqp-0000VV-Tq for 936@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVtql-0007yr-Cn; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:36:59 -0500 In-reply-to: <87eils901p.fsf@wanchan.jasonrumney.net> (message from Jason Rumney on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:30:10 +0800) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:38:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34380 Archived-At: I'm not sure what the difficulty is in making gnu.emacs.bug a moderated group with the bug tracker address as moderator, and output from the bug tracker considered as the moderated content. Maybe that is a good idea. I don't know enough to judge. However, ISTR that it is impossible to convert a moderated group into a nonmoderated group. If that is true, we should make damned sure this will work well, before trying it.