From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers". Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:23:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4B40914B.4070203@swipnet.se> <4B40AACE.9020002@swipnet.se> <87aawvi540.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> <83y6kecy04.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262622500 23953 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2010 16:28:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bojan@bnikolic.co.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 17:28:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRpms-0005eh-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:28:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpmt-0007hB-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpjD-0002pR-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpj9-0002e1-02 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:24:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58990 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpj7-0002dW-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.10] (port=56205 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRpj7-00015z-Jg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRpin-0004rE-8x; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:23:57 -0500 In-reply-to: <83y6kecy04.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:08:59 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119375 Archived-At: For the first edit ever in that branch, you are right. But once you begin working there, the histories of the branch and the trunk diverge, so a merge is necessary. But after you commit your changes from the branch to the trunk, isn't everything in sync until you start to edit again?