From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:10:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87hbso4s13.fsf@telefonica.net> <83aaygoy90.fsf@gnu.org> <87vdh36d48.fsf@telefonica.net> <831vjrptha.fsf@gnu.org> <87einr63b6.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6lzo9e7.fsf@gnu.org> <871vjr750o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tywnnq34.fsf@gnu.org> <873a475bsr.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocmu7x9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zl6crij4.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fx82856l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ws1cqqhm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87skbzqgaj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tywcg3to.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259640680 20973 80.91.229.12 (1 Dec 2009 04:11:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, stephen@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 01 05:11:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFK51-0005dv-Ee for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:11:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34477 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFK51-0002vo-3o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFK4A-0002SG-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFK45-0002Q6-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41882 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFK45-0002Pw-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35694) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFK44-00051p-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NFK44-0000Pe-Du; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:10:12 -0500 In-reply-to: <87tywcg3to.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:10:43 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118021 Archived-At: I think that once you have actually tried the workflow there (after the switchover) you will find it is not hard to use. I don't expect to ever try it. I am very busy, and I don't think it will be worth the effort. I am going to use the simple method. You're asking people to invest a substantial effort, saying they will find it worth while. Those who do a substantial amount of use of bzr may indeed find it so. But I probably won't use it that much, so for me the investment would not be worth while. I am sure there are many others in the same position.