From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
Cc: per.starback@gmail.com, dak@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.)
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:01:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NEmDB-0001p8-Hr@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1ND6lW-0006AU-Gx@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:33:54 +0900)
We don't want to raise the priority of windows-1252 because it would
cause many other encodings not to be recognized.
If it turns out that windows-1252 files are the main cause of
8-bit-control characters in the buffer, here's another idea.
If visiting a file gives you some 8-bit-control characters,
ask the user "Is this file encoded in Windows encoding (windows-1252)?"
and do so if she says yes.
Here's another idea. We could employ some heuristics to see if the
distribution of those characters seems typical for the way those
characters are used. For instance, some of the punctuation characters
(the ones that represent quotation marks) should always have
whitespace or punctuation on at least one side. Also, there should be
no ASCII control characters other than whitespace. Maybe more
specific heuristics can be developed.
These could be used as conditions for recognizing the file as
windows-1252. If these heuristics are strong enough, they could
reject nearly all false matches, provided the file is long enough.
(A minimum length could be part of the conditions.) Then we
could increase the priority of windows-1252 without the bad
side effect of using it when it is not intended.
This is ad-hoc, and not elegant. But the problem is important enough
in practice that an ad-hoc solution is justified if it works well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-29 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-18 19:12 [acm@muc.de: Re: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.] Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 1:27 ` Fwd: Re: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 8:20 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 8:50 ` Miles Bader
2009-11-19 10:16 ` Fwd: " Andreas Schwab
2009-11-19 12:21 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 13:21 ` Jason Rumney
2009-11-19 13:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 14:18 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 14:58 ` Jason Rumney
2009-11-19 15:42 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 15:58 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 16:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-19 16:47 ` Aidan Kehoe
2009-11-19 17:29 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 18:21 ` Aidan Kehoe
2009-11-20 2:43 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-19 19:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 20:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 19:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20 3:13 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-19 16:55 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-19 18:08 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 19:25 ` Davis Herring
2009-11-19 21:25 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 22:31 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-21 22:52 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-23 2:08 ` Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.) Stefan Monnier
2009-11-23 20:38 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-23 21:34 ` Per Starbäck
2009-11-24 22:47 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-25 1:33 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-25 2:29 ` Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly Stefan Monnier
2009-11-25 2:50 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-25 6:25 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-25 5:40 ` Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.) Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-26 22:59 ` Displaying bytes Reiner Steib
2009-11-27 0:16 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-27 1:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-27 4:14 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-25 5:59 ` Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.) Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-25 8:16 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-29 16:01 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2009-11-29 16:31 ` Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly Stefan Monnier
2009-11-29 22:01 ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-30 6:05 ` tomas
2009-11-30 12:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-30 12:39 ` tomas
2009-11-29 22:19 ` Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.) Kim F. Storm
2009-11-30 1:42 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-24 1:28 ` Displaying bytes Stefan Monnier
2009-11-24 22:47 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-25 2:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-26 6:24 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-26 8:59 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-26 14:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-26 16:28 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-27 6:36 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-24 22:47 ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-20 8:48 ` Fwd: Re: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 19:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 20:53 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 22:16 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-20 8:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 20:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 21:27 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19 21:57 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-19 23:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 20:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 14:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 14:50 ` Jason Rumney
2009-11-19 15:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 23:12 ` Miles Bader
2009-11-20 2:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20 3:37 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-20 4:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20 7:18 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-20 14:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-21 4:13 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-21 5:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-21 6:42 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-21 6:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-21 7:27 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-23 1:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-21 12:33 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-21 13:55 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-21 14:36 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-21 17:53 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-21 23:30 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-22 1:27 ` Sebastian Rose
2009-11-22 8:06 ` David Kastrup
2009-11-22 23:52 ` Sebastian Rose
2009-11-19 17:08 ` Fwd: " Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1NEmDB-0001p8-Hr@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@m17n.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=per.starback@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.