From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET merge question Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87eiql2w5s.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87k50bixsl.fsf@engster.org> <1252759780.4770.76.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252859993 31389 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2009 16:39:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, raeburn@raeburn.org, deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eric@siege-engine.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 13 18:39:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mms76-00066H-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:39:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45256 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mms76-0007IC-6C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mms6z-0007FD-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mms6u-000772-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37235 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mms6u-00076V-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:53007) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mms6t-0006s5-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mms6s-0007Ur-BU; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:39:30 -0400 In-reply-to: <1252759780.4770.76.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> (eric@siege-engine.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115274 Archived-At: A very similar question to "why not make bison support Emacs Lisp output", is "why not have gcc support tagging output". Could you please explain what you mean by that?