From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:20:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8AD328622F5645B282D1E72CB4582EF3@us.oracle.com> <873a77v31k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251841135 7461 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2009 21:38:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 01 23:38:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mib3v-0001lV-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:38:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mib3u-0005Sv-HU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mib2v-0004aj-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mib2q-0004Z9-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52214 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mib2q-0004Z6-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36733) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mib2q-0004JY-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MiamE-0006gm-BX; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:20:30 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:40:27 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114958 Archived-At: The best way to make such a distinction clearly visible is by providing an argument. Even better would be to make the argument mandatory. A mandatory argument would make people think, each time, about which question they want to ask. That would be good. But it would require changing every existing call to either of these functions. That's a rather high price.