From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:21:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5C8D2D84-C4B5-47A2-8392-370D7C3651CF@raeburn.org> <24F68B6C-96CD-4360-86E2-B0B2597B1633@raeburn.org> <87fxbbll61.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8763c7lh4p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251578191 12162 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2009 20:36:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, tromey@redhat.com, raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 29 22:36:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MhUeq-0004Yz-6N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:36:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39177 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhUep-0005lf-GI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhUeW-0005dR-H4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:36:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhUeT-0005bs-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:36:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45419 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhUeS-0005bh-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59750) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MhUeS-0005jV-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MhUQE-0002ms-7V; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:21:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <8763c7lh4p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (message from Miles Bader on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:15:34 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114846 Archived-At: There are a huge number of scheme implementations now; even thinking just about scheme, is guile still competitive? Guile is the GNU Scheme implementation; unless it is so inadequate that we should drop it entirely, it should be the one we use in Emacs (if we use one).