From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:44:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4A692E0A.9060108@gnu.org> <633A5994-67EB-4A21-AD99-3359CB5D6D65@Princeton.EDU> <656C A4DB-A331-4A84-A997-A3F744E65801@digg.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249188326 5198 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2009 04:45:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ams@gnu.org, cwulfman@Princeton.EDU, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ian Eure Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 02 06:45:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MXSwf-0005Kf-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:45:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXSwe-0003ot-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXSvl-0003Iu-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXSvi-0003HR-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35835 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXSvh-0003HH-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44015) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXSvg-0000pX-Va for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MXSvg-0004mv-8y; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:44:16 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Ian Eure on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:10:23 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113538 Archived-At: > If it is normal for apps on MacOS to expose their functionality for > access thru OSA, I think it is proper for Emacs to follow. > It would be very nice, though I don't know what's involved to make it work. I'd prefer to see the existing problems with the NS port fixed. We may be having a misunderstanding. I thought that this is part of what is already implemented, and what I'm saying is that there is no need to delete it. As for the Applescript feature, what you are saying is that you find it useful. I am sure it is, but the point is that that is not the only criterion.