From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1656D853-4154-4AAA-B6FE-8ADADA8647EF@gmail.com> <20090728.132511.262626447.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <871vo0b4jx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248968760 7374 80.91.229.12 (30 Jul 2009 15:46:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, hanche@math.ntnu.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chad Brown Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 30 17:45:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MWXpA-0003aH-3J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:45:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWXp9-0005f6-F2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:45:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWXp2-0005dc-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWXoy-0005aV-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:45:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57597 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWXox-0005aN-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47147) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWXox-0004My-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MWXfg-0003GI-UR; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:35:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Chad Brown on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:26:47 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113402 Archived-At: > One question is, do most apps on MacOS have _the same_ Applescript > capability that has been put into Emacs? Having only the level of capability that has been put into Emacs is considered a disadvantage in most applications. Could you name and describe the different levels of capability that apps can have, and say which one of them corresponds to Emacs?