From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:20 -0400
Message-ID: <E1MVqFo-0002wc-VR@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E8D91CDE-ABE9-4471-95F6-8E2B5D0B27C4@gmail.com>
	<wlmy6vzhvr.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<jwvws5zpgdp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<wleis70vzt.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<jwveis6opk5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<wlws5yyin6.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<jwvbpnahnex.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<wlbpnayg7j.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<jwvzlaug48n.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<wld47q7nyb.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<4A692E0A.9060108@gnu.org>
	<wlprbq3eiq.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<wl1vo5tspp.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<E1MUtNY-000629-1L@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<wl1vo4qih5.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<E1MVGCc-0004E7-1h@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<wltz0yke0h.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
	<E1MVUC8-0003PC-Ug@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<loom.20090727T183923-647@post.gmane.org>
	<E1MVeR3-0004xs-OE@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<633A5994-67EB-4A21-AD99-3359CB5D6D65@Princeton.EDU>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248801331 28639 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2009 17:15:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Clifford Wulfman <cwulfman@Princeton.EDU>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 28 19:15:25 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1MVqGr-0002Ph-2v
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:15:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42078 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVqGq-0007ri-7e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:15:24 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVqFt-0007Ub-NA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:25 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVqFq-0007SD-1Z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:25 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57414 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVqFp-0007SA-Oe
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:21 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:34849)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1MVqFp-0002D8-IP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:21 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1MVqFo-0002wc-VR; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:14:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <633A5994-67EB-4A21-AD99-3359CB5D6D65@Princeton.EDU> (message
	from Clifford Wulfman on Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:18:03 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113296
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/113296>

Thanks for the info.
Is it hard to implement background transparency on X?

However, Applescript is a potentially much more important issue.
I have not received an answer to my questions about Applescript,
so I cannot start to evaluate the issue.

Please don't make a release tomorrow, or until this issue gets
addressed.