From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:22:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4A692E0A.9060108@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248575274 9802 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2009 02:27:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: adrian.b.robert@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jasonr@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 26 04:27:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MUtSk-0004hc-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39891 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MUtSg-0003p4-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MUtSY-0003nR-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MUtST-0003m8-UU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38399 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MUtST-0003m5-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44865) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MUtST-0002IB-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MUtNY-000629-1L; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:22:24 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:13:54 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113150 Archived-At: Richard, is it OK with you to keep the following features only for a proprietary platform (Cocoa) in the Emacs 23.1 release? > 1. Code for stippling. This is wrongly implemented as tiling, which > has been controversial whether or not to be included in the other > platforms, IIUC. An incorrect implementation of stippling is somewhat of a bug, but it might be better than no implementation of stippling. Anyway, I don't see a reason to object that this is only on MacOS. > 2. Code for interpreting incompatible color formats: RGBrrggbb, > ARGBaarrggbb, HSVhhssvv, AHSVaahhssvv, and CMYKccmmyykk. Besides > the format itself, support for the alpha-component in color is > not found in the other platforms but not inherently NS-specific. These are minor things, nothing to object to. > 3. Lisp primitive ns-set-alpha (nsfns.m), which sets the alpha > component of the given color to the specified value. As in the > argument for the alpha-component above, this is not inherently > NS-specific. > 4. Lisp function ns-set-background-alpha (ns-win.el), which sets > alpha-component of frame background color. It is different from > the frame parameter `alpha' as Adrian explained. Again, this is > not inherently NS-specific. These too are rather minor, nothing to object to.